macintosh.world | Log In | Register
Today | News | Books | Recipes | Notes | YouTube | QuickTake
Translate | Wiki | Browse | Maps | Reference | Reddit | About

Back to Reddit

MAGA-influencer Riley Gaines being told/paid by Patriot Mobile handlers what her "sincerely held" beliefs are in leaked video

by /u/mgbgtv8 | 116 comments | 2026-06-12T21:17:34+00:00 Central

Open on Reddit

Lightweight Preview

Full Size

Comments

/u/KingSwank
Why do they all get plastic surgery to look like the
masks from the Purge?
/u/PM_DOLPHIN_PICS
Mar-A-Lago Face is a phenomenon that needs to be studied
academically.
/u/Rulligan
It has a Wikipedia page and it uses Hegsgeth as an
example
/u/CletusCanuck
You're not joking, omg. Even the Google summary is
low-key scathing.

The "Mar-a-Lago face" is a viral term for a distinct
cosmetic and beauty trend associated with the
Trump-aligned political circle. It features
hyper-sculpted aesthetics-like pillowy lips, frozen
foreheads from Botox, high and prominent cheekbones from
fillers, and heavy TV makeup. It serves as a conspicuous
status symbol, signaling wealth and loyalty to
conservative gender roles.

Characteristics of the Aesthetic

The look is generally achieved through a combination of
heavy makeup styling and cosmetic enhancements. Key
traits include: Facial Enhancements: Noticeable use of
injectables like Botox and volume fillers to create a
tight jawline, frozen brow, and "bee-sting" plump lips.
Contrasting Makeup: Heavy use of spray tans, dark smoky
eyes, fake eyelashes, and stark contouring or
highlighter. Bright White Teeth: Very bright, perfectly
straight cosmetic dental work is frequently incorporated
into the look.

The Cultural Context

The aesthetic is commonly linked to high-profile MAGA
movement figures and TV hosts. Sociological and beauty
analyses describe it not merely as a trend, but as an
expression of political alignment and group belonging.
It requires a massive investment of time and money,
functioning as a visual marker of privilege and
adherence to a specific, demanding style of femininity.

Professional Perspectives

Plastic surgeons and dermatologists have noted an
uptick in requests for the aesthetic, though it has
generated mixed reviews among the public. While some
patients favor the ultra-polished, upward-pulled look,
professionals also warn of the risks of overfilling,
which can limit natural facial expressions and create an
"uncanny valley" or homogenized effect.
/u/ApprehensiveGoat2734
And yet according to them dying your hair blue or having
a nose ring is a crime against nature, God, and country.
/u/avcloudy
To their credit, it's never been about being natural,
it's all about making choices about your appearance that
are non-traditional. It's exactly the same as them
looking down on someone because they wear shorts to work
instead of a suit and it comes from the same place.

They don't like the expression, not that you changed
your appearance. It's like their take on free speech,
where they think everyone should be free to say the
correct things and miss the point that the only rights
that need to protected are the ones other people don't
want you to exercise.
/u/bollvirtuoso
Sure, but then they just argue about cancel culture,
equivocating private actors and literal government
censorship.
/u/bbusiello
professionals also warn of the risks of overfilling,
which can limit natural facial expressions and create an
"uncanny valley" or homogenized effect.

I prefer to spot my enemies on sight rather than wait
til they open their racist, sexist, and homophobic
mouths. But that's just me.

Keep going! Get more filler!
/u/CritcoThinker
Oh these women are trying to stay relevant in the
patriarchy they inhabit. They know that being a young
woman has much value to the men around them. Ironically
aging is not easy to stop and the beauty standards they
enforced by upholding men's standards are their own
undoing. Awesome. Sick. But awesome.
/u/girlfriend_pregnant
They shouldn't be called enhancements though, more
neutrally "alterations"
/u/Wazula23
Theory I find appealing is it's like the gaudy powdered
wigs of the French monarchy. It's not supposed to look
"good", it's supposed to say "look what I can afford".
/u/rusty_handlebars
Oh that's fascinating
/u/bbusiello
Just another form of conspicuous consumption.
/u/sirtagsalot
I flip off everyone of those I see.
/u/ChainLC
vanity. never satisfied.
/u/PanicOnFunkotron
Like renting a pineapple
/u/SexyMcBeast
Yup. It's also a way to say "I'm fully in the club."
There are few more visible and permanent ways to show
you're in that clique than to literally alter the shape
and look of your face.
/u/C0rinthian
Yeah I was going to say: it's all about in-group
signaling. But the comparison to the French monarchy
might be a little unfair. I mean, those folks were
slathering mercury on their faces and shit because they
didn't know any better, it's not like... oh shit...
fuck.
/u/SlogurkTheOverslime
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costly_signaling_theory
/u/Cheap-Ad1821
It's like a face tattoo declaring you're a member of The
Aryan Sisterhood
/u/kylehatesyou
I like this one. This isn't just one procedure to "fix"
something you don't like the way people get breast
implants or a nose job, it's multiple procedures, done
relatively quickly. Cheek fillers, and lip fillers, and
Botox everywhere, and all the others over a year or two.
I imagine people didn't just have one wig, same way
those people didn't just have one suit or one dress.

That makes me wonder if it kind of takes on the very
rich version of that beauty salon thing some people
have. Like the people that "need" to go weekly or
biweekly or whatever to have their hair trimmed, or
roots touched up, or nails filled in or whatever because
their friends all do it too.

So you have a group of people who are talking about the
procedures they are having done, and because they're all
feeding off of each other and eventually already done
everything they can (and it's at least semi-permanent)
they just keep going back for a little more and a little
more until all of their faces look like a stone mask.
/u/j0y0
Kinda. At first it was to cover hair loss from syphilis.
But once all the fancy people at court are doing it,
rational people understand it's practical to fit in.
/u/Various_Opinion_900
People also legitimately thought it looked good. I swear
to god in 1000 years someone's going to unearth my
highschool photos and go: hm yes the bangs were actually
covering the eye as a form of protection from the
harmful radiation coming off of their primitive phone
technology! Unaided it left them blind before they
reached 20! And jeans were tight to stop the blood
circulation and prevent raging erections they got when
when mingling with their peers in large enclosed spaces
- can you believe? They went to communal schools and had
sex! How primitive... I'm so grateful we have our
privacy pods and government issued AI partners. Progress
sure is neat.
/u/Fancy-Trousers
I thought it was because they hang out with shithead
conservative men who lower their self-esteem constantly,
leading to a desire to "fix" themselves. But that makes
sense, too.
/u/andersonb47
My theory is that for most of human history, the elite
differentiated themselves visually/physically in various
ways, but usually clothing. Now that clothing and other
physical items are generally extremely plentiful and
easy to acquire, that status affirming behavior is now
translated into something still relatively inaccessible
- plastic surgery. It's worth noting that usually when
we think about plastic surgery, it's something that we
try to hide - the best surgeons' work is the hardest to
see. But in the case of Mar-a-Lago Face, the point is to
BE seen. It's a status marker.
/u/notflashgordon1975
Good, they can't disguise themselves when the real purge
starts.
/u/Enibas
A status marker and a sign of submission, they signal
that they want to be part of the in-group.
/u/Throwawaylikeme90
What I want to know is how it evolved to looking like
taking a scored sourdough and smashing it against a
sliding glass door windowpane.

Like, I'm no stranger to social signifiers. I've got
plenty myself, I adorn my body with modifications and
specific grooming to show where I came from knowingly,
because it's important to me.

It's easy for me to trace my signifiers lineage all the
way back to skins, mods and rudeboys growing up in
working-class neighborhoods like Liverpool, but this is
a social strata that is altogether alienated from the
mass of humanity for one and for two, they don't seem to
like their history or their own shit culture.

But legitimately, how the fuck did it get like THIS, of
all things, is a very interesting question.
/u/Weak-Material-5274
Supernormal stimuli.

If attention is money then looks are money. It doesn't
mean someone has to look good, they just have to look in
a way that is engaging.

Mara Lago face is engaging, therefore it is money.
/u/Throwawaylikeme90
I'm aware of the concept, that's not granular enough to
understand something this outlandish. I want tea my good
bitch. 💅
/u/DietSteve
Honestly, think about it: what were we pushed through
movies/tv/ads? Rail thin blonde with big tits. That
became the standard look to try and achieve, now we mix
it with BBLs and lip plumping and whatever else the
Kardashians are peddling this week, mix that in with a
healthy dose of conservative Christian repression, and
you end up with *this*.

The "I don't want to look like I got work done" look,
bottle blonde, "hometown" girl. Both country and metro,
clashing with each other in the never ending struggle
for identity of who they think they should be.
/u/skenvoy
I'm obsessed with this logic.
/u/Jops817
Right, like, I need a long form documentary about how
people could make themselves look like hideous soulless
ghouls as a social signifier.
/u/skenvoy
Actually... read up on Venetian ceruse, a lead-based
skin whitener. TLDR worn on your face to cover facial
scars and give you a ✨highly desireable✨ white
complexion (as a signal of status and wealth, not
wacism), but it was super obvious and unnatural looking
and y'know, lead poisoning gave you more facial scars
and other nasty side affects.

Ghouls for realsies.
/u/captainwacky91
These are people with enough wealth and power that
they've been somewhat "uncoupled" from nature, for
decades at a time.

It would only be "natural" for them to become
grotesques.

I get the exact same feeling when Facebook decides to
show me some 'roided-out mutant cattle.
/u/Lord_Alderbrand
I'm confused how no one seems to be factoring in Trump
himself. They try to look like 90s porn stars because
Trump wants his people to look like 90s porn stars. He
latched onto this look in his "heyday" and locked it in.
Yeah, it's outdated and tacky.

Trump is obsessed with television. He thinks about
everything in terms of television and he considers
himself The Director. He dictates how things should be,
how people should look, how they should act, all in
order to get Ratings. It's everybody else's primary job
to make things look the way he wants. This is like, THE
main thing Trump cares about. Period.

So yeah, he tells the people in his admin to look that
way. They hear him tell people to get work done. They
hear him criticize others for not doing it. They see him
hire new staff based on their looks. Everybody knows
that their job is always on the line, so they try to
obey in advance to hold onto Trump's approval, and it
snowballs from there. Then they continue to warn/police
each other to cover all their bases until it turns into
a standardized look. Then his lower-level followers try
to imitate it, and voila: Mar-a-Lago Face.
/u/scarytrafficcone
it has been, it's a combination of in-group signaling
(see the way evangelical women do their hair,)
differentiation from the poor (I can afford this
expensive cosmetic surgery,) and signaling feminine
subservience i.e. showing with their appearance that
they care about the men of a particular group's (in this
case conservative rich guys) taste, which happens to
also be women who have proactively signaled their
willingness to participate in the group dynamic of power
exchange
/u/sihaya09
They all get gender-affirming surgeries to increase
sexual dimorphism.
/u/NewButOld85
Think of French aristocrats wearing ridiculous wigs and
clown-white makeup back before the Revolution. Did they
do it to look good? No - they looked like goddamn
idiots. But it was a way to signal that they were able
to afford the look, and that they belonged above the
"commoners."

Mar-A-Lago face plastic surgery is the same thing, just
among rich conservatives. It's virtue signaling among
their people.
/u/Wazula23
Hunger Games got so much right.
/u/Gloomy-Dingo4293
The older I get, the more I realise how scarily accurate
those books are
/u/GearSalty2775
The Met Gala literally looks like an elitist Capitol
party.
/u/exitwest
Look up photos of the Kentucky Darby Attendees. It's
Capitol fashion all over.
/u/koshgeo
More like vice signaling.
/u/sulkee
Well, no, not really. They used it to cover up their
syphilitic scars actually. And it became a trend due to
that. makeup and wigs were used to cover the scarring.
/u/Not_A_Clever_Man_
Maga face shows that you have enough disposable income
to fuel your vanity.

It shows you value money and appearance over everything
else. It shows that you are as vain as dear leader and
can be easily blackmailed and manipulated with money.
/u/Numes1
I've always thought the puppet from saw was more like
them. 🤣🤣
/u/Funkycoldmedici
Authoritarians want to be like everyone else and
everyone to be like them. Conformity, in-group
identification is the one and only value conservatives
truly hold. They do not actually care about anything
else.
/u/Mo_Jack
Like the whacko religions that pressure attendees into
making weird noises and pretending that it was that
individual's special language that only the Holy Spirit
could understand. It is a test of conformity by
humiliating yourself in public, much like gangs "blood
in".
/u/rubbarz
And its always naturally pretty 20 year olds getting
their face filled to look 50.

It still blows my mind that Karoline Levitt is 28. She
looks as old as her husband.
/u/HotGarbage
It's a gender affirming face.
/u/No_Helicopter1378
Isn't she the swimmer? Crazy that someone so young is
getting so much work done already.
/u/bbusiello
A "tied for 5th place" swimmer.
/u/blindspotted
More like Rocky Dennis "Mask".
/u/mrnipper
This probably goes a long way toward explaining it for a
lot of them, at least until they get around to taking
this down:

The Dark Triad of Personality in Relation to Acceptance
to Cosmetic Surgery Among University Students
/u/daddydrank
So they never have to face themselves in the mirror.
/u/straylight_2022
Gotta hand it to her for being able to turn a fifth
place finish into a four year and counting cash grab.
/u/anode8
Meanwhile, her college swim coach is facing allegations
of sexual assault against some of her teammates. Not a
peep from her about the actual problems.
/u/DizzyDjango
Pablo Torre has a great episode on how she went from a
nobody to making millions by spreading anti-trans hate
across college campuses. Also talks about the coach and
has interviews with former teammates.
/u/who-hash
Hadn't seen that episode yet but I'm not surprised.
Pablo Torre is one of the few doing actual journalism in
sports in 2026.

So proud to see this brother and his staff win a
Pulitzer.
/u/Introverted_Extrovrt
Nominated for a Peabody, too
/u/PDGAreject
He also verified the accuracy of a video of harambe
eating his own poop. So there's that too
/u/thetreat
Pablo Torre, a true renaissance man of the modern times.
/u/Ok_Hornet_714
Here is the link for those that are interested

https://youtu.be/iKUl8lkuGOc?si=kKpBdAQsv7PvnXrF
/u/papasan_mamasan
Very interested, thank you!

This video needs more views
/u/PM_ME_JJBA_STICKERS
That episode was eyeopening for me. Riley Gaines is a
rat who believes in absolutely nothing but making money
from the grift.
/u/Think_Monk_9879
She's making millions? Really?
/u/DizzyDjango
If I remember correctly, she's making around $250k per
speaking engagement now.
/u/straylight_2022
She makes around half a million from the "institute" she
is attached to and who knows what in individual speaking
fees.
/u/maximumfacemelting
So billionaires funding culture wars so they can have
more tax breaks and political control.
/u/The-Real-Number-One
The billionaire that is funding her is Trump's first
Sec. of Education -- Betsy Devos.
/u/counterfitster
Plenty of those billionaires are also true believers in
the shitty side of it anyway.
/u/hunteddwumpus
Plenty of poor people are fully true believers in
hateful shit too
/u/CodifiedLikeUtil
So you don't have to be rich to be stupid?
/u/jb_in_jpn
Whatever keeps us divided and distracted. It's been a
pretty good investment for them if you ask me.
/u/jeffp12
One of her big points was sharing the locker room with a
* gasp * trans person. What if that evil trans did
something!? They didn't, but what if!?

Then she went and endorsed Donald Trump, a man who has
famously been a backstage/dressing room creep on teen
girls
/u/DrunkyMcStumbles
And forced his way into a women's dressing room to
assault a woman.
/u/mgbgtv8
And Riley Gaines' husband is not an American citizen
/u/_jump_yossarian
But he's the white color.
/u/thorubos
She's here to make money not ensure justice, or even be
a good person.
/u/ScyllaIsBea
Is this the girl who didn't like tying for fifth with a
trans girl?
/u/moconahaftmere
She didn't even mind. Interviews at the time quoted her
as being supportive of the trans movement.

She only switched her opinion once she was getting paid
to do so.
/u/Sure_Land_8930
Fox News liked her pissing and moaning so much that they
gave her "The Riley Gaines Show".

https://www.foxnews.com/person/g/riley-gaines
/u/BusGuilty6447
Interestingly, she originally was not that upset over
it. She tweeted something along the lines of wishing the
trans athlete success (both in swimming and transition).
RW media found out about the case, and they gave her a
platform, a bunch of money, and here we are today.
/u/TrulyOutrageous42
If the US right wing didn't have manufactured outrage,
they'd have nothing other than the criminal indictments
waiting for them.
/u/MrGulio
If Conservative voters didnt find fake things to be mad
at they'd have to reckon with the fact that we live
within their chosen economic system and they are fucking
miserable. Either the system they proport to want is
awful, or it works and they are miserable working within
it. They really cannot mentally accept this so they have
to invest reasons why "X thing is bad not like it used
to be".
/u/Spookyrabbit
Conservatives have never found or otherwise accidentally
lucked into finding a fake thing to be mad at. Each
thing is carefully selected and studied for its value in
distracting conservative voters from the real agenda of
conservatives, which they know no one would ever vote
for.

Right wing billionaires (and other anti-democracy
entities) set up entire networks of companies to stage
manage every step of everything conservative voters will
be programmed to be mad at.

If you watch them long enough you'll see their
operatives bragging about what they've been able to
weaponize, such as the time Christoper Rufo bragged
about turning CRT - an obscure later-year law elective -
into something conservative voters could blame for every
single thing they hate about black people.
/u/CriticalDog
Not true! The conservatives in the US have always been
deeply racist. So, they've got that going for them.
/u/PM_ME_JJBA_STICKERS
Interestingly, she was also really close to her swim
coach and considered him a good mentor... The same coach
who was repeatedly sexually abusing her own teammates
and staff!
/u/cavalier24601
Worse than that: Riley had to be sent a 5th place
trophy. They only had one and it went to the other
person in 5th place. Clearly, trans athletes are ruining
women's sports /s
/u/Signiference
Finishing in 5th place and getting a trophy is the real
problem.
/u/Wes_Warhammer666
Seriously. After 3rd, why the fuck is anyone getting a
trophy?
/u/a_song_4U
No one has gained MORE from the existence of trans
people than this ridiculous bitch. She is giving
speeches and on tv constantly because she was in a race
that a trans person also competed in. She should have to
kick back a percentage of her earnings to the trans
community
/u/doneandtired2014
She is giving speeches and on tv constantly because she
was in a race that a trans person also competed in.

If you remove the trans athlete from the equation
entirely, it does not change the fact this hate
mongering twat still would've placed 5th, still wouldn't
have been on the podium, and still would have finished
her athletic career as a decent athlete as opposed to a
great one.

Competing against a trans athlete was the best thing to
have ever happened* to her because she would be a
fucking nobody if she hadn't.
/u/hypercosm_dot_net
because she would be a fucking nobody if she hadn't.

You're spot on about everything though. Imagine the
complete emptiness a person must have to accept a role
like this.
/u/doneandtired2014
Imagine the complete emptiness a person must have to
accept a role like this.

I might be an asshole with tendencies that border on
sociopathic, but I can't imagine being the kind of
maladjusted, amoral shitbag that feels compelled to
spread and profit from hate just to make up for personal
failures.
/u/Elsa_the_Archer
I don't have to hand her shit. She's contributing to
getting trans people killed. She can fuck right off.
/u/straylight_2022
I agree, I was just being sarcastic.
/u/Waiting4Reccession
How do people even remember who these bimbos are
/u/raspymorten
If you're a trans or just generally queer person, you've
had to hear her talk a whole lot, for a really fucking
long time, across tons of different platforms, about how
much her life was ruined when she had to tie with a
trans athlete.

These voices get an insane amount of air time to spout
this sort of stuff, so it's hard to not end up having
the prominent ones get lodged into your brain.
/u/shoguante
Money. The culture wars are a distraction from the 1%
ripping everyone else off.
/u/Due-Cow9514
Reminder that when Riley Gaines was originally
interviewed about her loss, she straight up didn't care.
That's when reactionary media came knocking...
/u/Euphoric-Witness-824
Yep. The wealthy need their culture wars front and
center constantly. They were, and still are, using trans
people as one of their favorite boogeymen because it
works really well for them. These right wingers by
influencers are only popular because the wealthy own the
news and social media platforms that hire them and push
them to the top of everyone's algorithm. They suppress
unifying voices and raise culture war decisive voices.
It's all part of their gameplan and it's working really
well for them.
/u/superscatman91
It wasn't even a loss. She tied for 5th. If Lia Thomas
wasn't in the competition she would have still been in
5th place.
/u/Neon_Casino
Look I agree with you, but the fact of the matter is,
until we "win" the culture war (whatever that looks
like) we won't get anywhere with the war that actually
matters becasue around 50% of Americans are actively on
the side of the ultra rich.

Look over at the Conservative subreddit. They posted
how "the left is going nuts now that Elon Musk is the
world's first Trillionare" (their words, not mine) and
all the comments are celebrating Musk and saying what a
hard worker he is and how someone being a billionare
doesn't affect us.

The American right wing needs to be utterly demolished
if there is even the slightest chance in hell that any
progress against Billionares can be made.
/u/dobie1kenobi
If the last 8 years have taught me anything, it's that
there is no winning the culture war. I was raised to
believe that the moral arc of the universe would
eventually lead us to a Star Trek style unified planet
that accepted all cultures as human first. I no longer
believe this. No matter what technological advances we
achieve, there will always be racists, bigots, and
Nazis. No amount of prosperity will mollify them and no
amount of punishment will quell them. We'd have a better
time eradicating the cockroach. The trick is to get them
out of power and keep their beliefs on the fringe. That
is doable but what the Boomers forgot is, it's a daily
struggle to keep them there. You can't give MLK a
holiday and call it quits.
/u/Not_a_Rodeo_Clown
We thought we were headed for Star Trek, but we're
headed for The Expanse.
/u/JustaSeedGuy
In fairness, this is the 2020s. Based on the timeline of
Star Trek's fictional history, we're right on track for
Star Trek.

People forget that the utopia of Star Trek came after
total societal and economic collapse and nuclear
devastation on Earth.
/u/StevelandCleamer
We don't get Star Trek without the Post-Atomic Horrors
first

It sounds like there's some bad stuff right before the
Post-Atomic Horrors too, if you catch my drift.

It doesn't hurt that the Vulcans were first contact
either, a civilization that wasn't in a rush to help the
remaining warmongers on Earth into weaponized starships.

Unfortunately, I have lost faith in humanity's
potential to survive beyond the lifespan of Earth.
/u/SDivilio
If we get all of the fascists onto mars, that'll also
put us on track for several Gundam variants as well
/u/Big_Kahuna_69
Hah, we're headed for Robocop, The Running Man, or
Idiocracy. Take your pick.
/u/Vexxed72
Why pick? All three at the same time is sadly the most
likely outcome.
/u/Neon_Casino
Hard agree. But imo, that is winning the culture war. Of
course there will always be racists, but if we can drive
them back into the shadows where they belong, then
that's a win.

I think there is a way to "win" in this sense, but it
will require a level of viciousness that I don't think a
lot people are ready for. I'm not talking about just
killing them all of course, but we need to make it so
that being an open racist/hard right-winger in this
country is impossible.

If they are family, cut them off. If you have a
business, do not serve them. If they have a business, do
not give them your business. These people need to be
treated as less than Human. Make them feel unwelcome
EVERYWHERE. Basically, everything just short of physical
violence.

Will it cause them to change their ways? Nope. But it
may cause them to stop being so proud of their own
fucking stupidity.
/u/Grey_0ne
I feel this... Every word of it. I've spent the last 20
years of my life on social media watching people try to
debate, argue, quip, logic and moral our society in a
utopian direction... Then in a moderately progressive
direction... Then in a direction where we could at the
very least respect the basic rights of others... And now
after spending the last 20 years watching as things have
only gotten worse, we're fighting for our lives
(literally in some cases) against people who can't be
fucked to believe in basic accountable facts, because
their only real goal is to hurt the people they hate, so
they've surrendered their souls over to ghouls like this
who are only interested in making a buck off of them.

It will get worse as our standards continue to reflect
what's been normalized...
/u/ratherbealurker
> and all the comments are celebrating Musk and saying
what a hard worker he is and how someone being a
billionare doesn't affect us.

Mm hmm, mention George Soros and watch them flip out
over a billionaire "paying protesters" and whatever else
they claim he's backing. Then mention how Elon literally
tried to pay people for their votes. Or sort of did? And
how much money he throws into politics, and they're fine
with that. Then hold up your 9.5 white card for their
gymnastic abilities.
/u/rorschach2
First thing you did wrong was checking the conservative
sub. That's almost all bots.